Sunday, October 31, 2021

The Obedience of Hope

 “We rarely have been given the whole picture, but we’ve all been given enough to obey.”

— Bill Johnson (“The Devil’s Tactics,” 7/30/2020)

*****

Some years ago, I was sitting in the auditorium of a megachurch in Southern California, waiting with an unknown number of other students to be told, officially, that we’d really made it through that grueling race of confusion they call “college.” We were listening to our commencement speaker, a gentleman probably none of us had ever heard of and whose name (and subsequent authoritative alphabet soup) probably none of us would remember. Mostly, I think, we were wondering how many pictures we’d have to bear before someone would announce lunch, or perhaps how long it would take (and whether it was worth it) to undo all the bobby pins holding our caps so we could participate in the customary celebratory toss at the end of the ceremony—and how embarrassing would it be if we missed it?

Here and there our minds would drift back to the address, which we all knew was supposed to have been a very encouraging send-off that reminded us ever-so-nicely of the clichés we’d spent senior year questioning: “You’re built for this! Follow your heart! The world is lucky to have you!”

But in our case the clichés were different. And they weren’t encouraging. The speaker’s address wasn’t even really addressed to us. It was aimed at the business execs and tightly-coated employers and frizzy-haired mid-level managers sitting behind us—the ones we were about to join in that other grueling race of confusion they call “work.” Our speaker wanted them to know what they were getting. His word for it: millennials.

He looked right over our caps into their eyes and told them that we were going to be quite a strange breed to work with. He gave them tips on “engaging” us, strategies for “communicating,” warnings about the oddities we were about to bring. I think there were some positive notes in there somewhere, something about, “If you give ’em a chance, they might surprise you with a good idea.” But for the most part, his speech felt like a warning to the world at the strange aliens that were about to be unleashed amongst its unsuspecting citizenry.

I’ve wondered about that speech many times since then. Of course, by now, it’s muddled in my head, probably exaggerated over time. It’s the feeling I remember, not the words. Yet that feeling is one that puzzles me repeatedly. Why is it that there is so much distrust between generations? Why are millennials stereotyped as troublesome and aimless unconventionalists who may come up with a good idea sometimes but who more frequently cause their employers to rub their foreheads and sigh? What caused the rift? What’s “wrong” with us? And how in the world do we fix it?

These are dense questions. And I’m not about to pretend I have answers for them.

But there is one aspect I do want to touch, and I’m going to touch it, admittedly, from the perspective of a millennial. It is this: When my generation looks at the world, we’re not entirely convinced that we like what we see. And we’re pretty vocal about it. That’s what gets us into trouble at times. We look at what’s been handed us on an institutional and cultural level (think schools, churches, political games, corporate structures, socio-cultural norms and attitudes, etc.), and we pick apart what we see: the ironies, the hypocrisies, the oppression, the boredom, the lack of flexibility. And then we’re told that we’re ungrateful, that we’re lazy, and that we just need to suck it up and deal with it because that’s the way the world “is.” And our response, largely, is anxiety-ridden despair. We’d been told for so long that we could be anything, but when the chance comes, we find ourselves trapped between not liking what we see and having far too many options and obstacles around us to even begin thinking of a way to fix it.

I’m speaking broadly about this. And likely, as I do so, there are a lot of you reading this who aren’t millennials but feel the same way—and likely a lot of you who are millennials but don’t feel it one bit. (And both of those are assuming that “a lot” of people are even reading this at all.)

The point I’m trying to get at, though, is that one of the things we millennials tend to bring to the cultural, institutional, and societal “table” is a willingness to expose the hypocrisies that we see. Some of us seem to do that “exposing” by expressing panic, hatred, cynicism, or apathy (usually in memes or videos that seem shallow and inconsequential at first glance). Others have been able to clarify their reactions by starting conversations, lending themselves to service projects, or pursuing other ways to “make a difference.” Yet even the most mature voices shake with pain, with questions, and with aimlessness in the midst of trying to sound like they’ve found an answer in their latest “life hack.”

Perhaps it’s here that I should admit my voice is shaking too. What I’m about to say is worth saying, I think. But it feels inconclusive. And as I say it, there are tears in my eyes because it’s hard to keep believing it. But maybe just starting the conversation is enough for right now. And in that conversation, there are two things I want to say.

1. My generation is crying out for direction, and the places we’re looking for it are not where we’re going to find it.

It may be that everyone is crying out for direction; maybe millennials just cry for it more loudly. But we are crying, crying for help in a world that is overwhelming, a world with too many options and not enough hope. We are aimless, trying to work jobs and navigate adulthood even though we’ve watched our parents’ misery and aren’t really sure we’ll find anything else. And as we feel all of these things, we’re beaten down by the voices around us, voices that say we’re soft, incapable, and annoying. Yet in our usual candid manner, we can’t help but admit that the direction we needed wasn’t passed down to us like it should have been. What we got were Disney princesses telling us to dream and wish for rescue by fate and a kiss. We got years of education in math and science and physics and statistics—strategies to increase our illusion of control over a world that’s quite out of that control. We got escapist eschatology from the Christian circles, postmodern cynicism from our colleges, manipulative media that wants our attention rather than our growth, and psychology’s coping mechanisms to help us carry on the pretense that all of this is “manageable.”

But what we needed? What we needed was the very thing that’s been silenced.

What we needed was somebody to say, and to say honestly, “This is where the good way is. And this is how you walk in it” (see Jer. 6:16). What we needed was somebody to tell us seriously, with their words and their lives, “The commands of the LORD are radiant, giving light to the eyes” (Ps. 19:8b, NIV 1984). What we needed was a generation that had committed to teaching their children the commands of the LORD “so the next generation would know them, even the children yet to be born, and they in turn would tell their children” (Ps. 78:6).

This has not been entirely absent. I’m still alive today because I’ve known people who were able to point to the “ancient path” of which Jeremiah speaks. I’m still hanging on because I’ve known people who have recounted the stories of the Lord’s faithfulness loudly, specifically, and often, so that I could have no doubt that the answers I’ve been looking for could be found in Him.

And yet, when I look at the generational level, the voices we need the very most are the voices that culture wants quiet: the voices that proclaim the truth of Jesus directly and unashamedly, even the parts that our culture condemns as offensive, outdated, irrelevant, and illogical. To those leaders who are proclaiming this truth, I must say, “Thank you.” But I must also say, to us all, “We need more.”

2. Perhaps even more than direction, my generation needs hope.

I was listening to The BEMA Podcast a few days ago, and the hosts were discussing the betrayals of Jesus by Judas and Peter (Episode 131: “Betrayal,” Aug. 22, 2019). What they said was that, from a Jewish perspective, Peter’s betrayal was worse. Whereas Judas acted from a misunderstanding of his Rabbi’s purpose, trying to push Him to move a little faster on the whole messianic-revolt-against-Rome thing, Peter denied (three times) having any association with his Master at all. In the Jewish world, Judas could have been rebuked and reinstated. Peter had wiped himself off the map.

And yet, the Gospel writers make it clear that Judas was the one who betrayed Jesus. Peter gets another chance.

Why? The podcast hosts conclude it was simply a question of which of the two men kept their hope. Judas gave up. After his mistake, he took his own life. But Peter let Jesus take him on a walk on the beach, excruciating as that must have been. He let Jesus into the place of his fatal mistake, and he was given a second chance, a chance to go again.

The Scriptures often picture God as the One who can conquer chaos. At His command, seas still, storms are silenced, and horrible monsters grow tame. The mistake that Judas made—the big one, I mean—was his decision to give up on hope that the Rabbi he witnessed calming the raging seas was able to conquer chaos in him too. He didn’t trust that there would be a second chance.

This is the question I believe we’re faced with when we examine the “state of things” I’ve just described. Our world is chaos. No generation knows how to handle that. We’ve made mistakes. We’ve prioritized wrongly. We’ve set up structures and propagated attitudes that are unhelpful, destructive, and immoral. 

And yet, in the face of it all, we have to ask the question that Judas and Peter may not have even realized they were facing: Will we give up hope? 

As much as I think our world could have been vastly improved by previous generations providing direction, committing to pastoring and shepherding and pointing people emphatically to Jesus, we all know speculation doesn’t help things much. What we have before us instead is the task of asking, “What shall we do now?”

The cultural currents are murky. The skies look dark. But we’ve seen our Rabbi on wild waters before. Will we believe that He can conquer chaos again? Will we hang on to hope that He does have answers, that He will quiet our seas, and that our mistakes are only tragic if we let them be? 

Bill Johnson, as quoted earlier, said, “We rarely have been given the whole picture, but we’ve all been given enough to obey.”

Maybe all the direction we have right now is the direction to keep hoping. Maybe hope is our obedience. But if Peter’s story teaches us anything, that hoping is enough to set us with Jesus on the path of a second chance, a chance to see Him conquer chaos again.

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Judges and Scripture and Life: What Defines the Story?

 “You diligently study the Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life. These are the Scriptures that testify about Me…”

ー Jesus (Jn. 5:39, NIV 1984)

*****

Have you ever read the book of Judges?

Oh, don’t give me that blank stare. You’ve read some of it, at least? 

Okay, here, let me help refresh your memory: Samson? Gideon? Deborah? The chilling summary line: “In those days Israel had no king; everyone did as he saw fit” (21:25)?

Or maybe you’re at least familiar with the so-called “sin cycle” that has appeared on white boards, PowerPoints, and (dare I say) projector slides in Bible classrooms for decades? Here is an example that I drew just for you. Please enjoy the detailed, professional illustrations:


Now do you remember? 

Great. Now let me introduce you to something I heard last night around 12:30 a.m. (Yes, I do confess I was awake at that hour listening to a podcast on the book of Judges. Don’t ask.)

The podcast I was listening to is called The BEMA Podcast. I think it’s honestly been the best gift I have encountered in years. The hosts of the show, Marty Solomon and Brent Billings, give an extensive walk-through of the biblical text over the course of 6 seasons (at least at the time of this writing). They engage the text by acknowledging and wrestling with the tough questions it evokes (rather than just ignoring or explaining away those questions and pretending like nothing’s wrong). They explore the layers of meaning and beauty within the text and provide insights from ancient rabbinical teachings as they go, ultimately highlighting the wonder of what it is to “gnaw” on Scripture and to learn, from it, who God is and who we are meant to be as His people.

Multiple times, their discussions have stopped me in my tracks and made me sit still, just thinking about the weight of what they’ve said, trying to grasp the impact that an understanding they’ve shared might have on my understanding of Scripture as a whole, and marveling at the seeming insanity of the realization that I managed to make it through this much of my life (and years and years of Christian education) without ever hearing of the possibility of an approach like this before.

And last night was no different. I was listening to an episode on the book of Judges entitled “The Redemption Cycle” (released June 29, 2017). And in it, Marty said something that floored me. He mentioned, as I did above, the characteristic “sin cycle” that most people use in teaching the book of Judges, but he asked a question (or, rather, a series of questions) I’d never considered before. In his words: 
My thundering question in my head as I’ve always heard this taught time and time and time again is: Why is this a sin cycle? When we see this cycle of the people in the book of Judges, how come our focus is on the sin and putting flames in the Judges graphic? How come this isn’t on the redemption of God? How come this cycle isn’t about God’s patience and God’s unbelievable longsuffering and His continual, never-ending pursuit of His people?¹

Put concisely, in Marty’s words again, “How come it’s about my failure and not God’s redemption?” (ibid.). Shortly after this, he nearly erupts in incredulity: “We read the Bible through the lens of Genesis 3, and it’s impacted the way we read everything” (ibid.).

Pause with me for a minute. Do we realize the gravity of what he is saying? 

If our outline of Judges is focused on Israel’s sin, Israel’s failings, and Israel’s hardheaded tomfoolery…have we been so focused on that that we’ve missed YHWH in the middle of it? 

And what about when we read the rest of Scripture? How do we write its narrative arc? Is it all about people’s faults and failures, inconsistencies and idiocies? Is it all about what God “had” to do to make sure He kept His promises to Adam and Abraham? Do we read of His victorious redemption as though it was in spite of human behavior? 

What about our own lives? Are they defined by our bad decisions, our stubbornnesses, and our fears? Do we “read” our own story as a record of all the stuff God had to wade through to finally, mostly, get us where He was trying to get us to go? 

In all of it, are we more impressed by the sinfulness of people or by the patience of God? Do we remember stories by just how awful we were (or others were), or is that memory coupled with一better, dwarfed by一the mind-boggling patience and relentless redemption of God?

Let me ask that question again: Do we remember stories based on our foolishness, or is our foolishness dwarfed by the faithfulness of God? 

Marty and Brent took their podcast discussion from here toward a different point, but I can’t help but sit on this more. I can’t help but wonder with them if we are一or, at least, I am一missing something in my thinking about Scripture and my thinking about my own life.

Two thoughts come to my mind.

1. In the verse I quoted at the beginning of this post, Jesus said that all of the Scriptures testify about Him. How we’re reading Scripture, then, is crucial. If we’re caught up in exasperation at the mistakes of humans in its pages without balancing that exasperation with awe at the Lord’s unending determination to save His people and wash them clean, we may have missed the point. The point we’re supposed to get from all those stories is that this is who God is: He is “the LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation” (Ex. 34:6-7, NIV 1984). God cares about righteousness. He really does. And yet the ratio there is 1000 to 3. If we fail to be impressed by the faithfulness of His love, manifest in all of Scripture but most manifest in the person of Jesus Christ, I think we’ve missed the point.

2. When we look at our own lives, the same defining arc should guide our interpretation of our story. When we look back, we might remember our sputterings and bumblings and outright rebellions. But they should be dwarfed by the sheer awe that comes from recognizing the mercy of God that’s been there the whole time. Self-accusations, horror at our own failures, and fear of failing in the future all have to bow to His patience and grace, His definition of our story. What He has forgiven is forgiven.

A question popped into my head a few days ago, before I happened upon any of this Judges content, and I think I’ll close with it here: If you found out that you were not all the things you accuse yourself of, what then would you do?

If God’s faithful love defines our lives and our readings of Scripture, dwarfing all our own thoughts about who we are and who we’ve been and what’s possible next, then I guess we’d best believe Him. We’d best believe Him and simply fall on grace. 

——————————————

¹ Solomon, Marty. “The Redemption Cycle.” The BEMA Podcast, hosted by Brent Billings. Season 2 Episode 36, 29 June 2017, https://www.bemadiscipleship.com/36.

P.S. If you decide to give The BEMA Podcast a listen, I’d highly recommend starting from the beginning. It’s the best way to get a clear picture of the perspectives they’re teaching and using throughout the podcast. Enjoy!

Friday, May 7, 2021

Accepting the Gift

 “You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies...”

~ Psalm 23:5a (NIV, 1984)

*****

There is a story in II Kings 4 about a wealthy woman to whom God gives a gift. But she doesn’t want it. You see, she was the kind of person that did lots of nice things for other people. But she didn’t do them to be noticed. And she definitely didn’t do them to get a gift back.

She asked her husband one day if they could build and furnish a little room on their roof for Elisha, the man of God who came by their house for a meal whenever he was in town. What a little thing, she probably thought. We have the space, and I’m sure he would so appreciate the chance to have his own place whenever he comes here. Her husband agreed. So they built the room and placed in it a bed, a table, a chair, and a lamp. And the man of God loved it. He was so grateful. A place to himself, away from the hustle and bustle of the town—and reserved just for him whenever he came to visit. 

And so he came often, whenever he was in town, and stayed with the woman and her husband. But one day, while he was in his little room and gazing at the kind gift he had been given, he found himself wondering, How can I give a gift to her in return?

He turned to his servant and gave him a message for the woman. “How can we bless you in return for all you’ve done for us?” the message said. “We have connections with the king, connections with the commander of the army. What can we do for you?”

But the woman didn’t need anything. She didn’t have any requests.

So the man of God wondered some more. He asked his servant, “Do you have any ideas?” The servant thought of one: “What about a son?”

A son...the man of God thought to himself. Of course! A son is an excellent idea. Her husband is old, and she has no children now. A son would mean her family line could live on, and someone would be there to take care of her if her husband passed away.

And so the man of God announced the news to the woman: “About this time next year, you will hold a son in your arms.”¹

But then he saw her look down. She bit her lip. “‘No, my lord,’ she objected. ‘Don’t mislead your servant, O man of God!’”²

But what happens when God’s prophets speak is what happened here: the word was fulfilled, and the woman gave birth to a son.

It could have been a great story just like that, and that’s probably all we’d typically want out of it. The woman gives generously to the man of God and is rewarded with a great gift in return, even though she didn’t believe at first that it would happen. 

But the story doesn’t end there. Spoiler alert: The child dies.

The woman puts her son in Elisha’s room, saddles a donkey, and takes a 25-mile trip to find the man of God. And when she finds him, she says just about exactly what we would have expected her to say: “Did I ask you for a son, my lord?...Didn’t I tell you, ‘Don’t raise my hopes’?”³

In other words: What’s this about? I told you I didn’t want a gift. I told you my heart couldn’t take the disappointment. I couldn’t take another chance to be fooled. Yet you went and did it anyway, and now I’m in more grief now than I had been before your so-called “blessing.”

Have you been there before? Have you hesitated to open your hands to a gift because you didn’t think you’d be able to bear it if it turned out to be a joke? Have you opened your hands anyway to receive it, desperately hoping your doubts are amiss and it’ll turn out to really be the blessing you secretly hope for...only to find that it’s not? ...only to find that it’s a slap in the face?

The woman was broken with grief—not just because her son died but because she felt like the whole thing was a cruel mockery of her heart. She didn’t want the blessing because she guessed the blessing would prove to be a joke. And it was strangely worse to find out that she was right, that it did.

But, thankfully, that’s not the end of the story either. The man of God returned with the woman to her house, and he prayed for her son, and her son was restored to life. When the woman saw it, she fell to the ground in humble thanks. It turns out the blessing wasn’t a joke. It felt like it. But in the end, God showed her that He really did intend to bless her, to pour good into her life—real, 100% good, not some shabby, piecemeal, half-good that would more appropriately be called a curse. His heart was not to tease or to mock. His heart was to teach her—in a way she would never forget—that He was out to work for her blessing.

As I read this story, I couldn’t help but think how often in my own life I distrust the idea of blessing. Even little blessings can be suspicious: Did that compliment mean they want something from me now? Do they enjoy spending time with me because they like who I am or because they like what I can do for them? It seems almost every time a “gift” comes my way, I find myself circling around it carefully before I dare open it, listening and looking with every nerve on edge to make sure it’s really a gift and not a bomb...because too many of them have been bombs, and I’m not interested in exploding again.

This woman probably felt the same way. There’s no way of knowing what happened in her life before this encounter that caused her to distrust the idea of a gift now. But clearly something did. Clearly something in her story taught her that gifts were not always good. And she turned out to be both right and wrong: What she thought was a curse turned out to be an even bigger blessing than she expected. Not only did she have the chance to witness God’s assurance that He really did want to give her this gift, but she also was further blessed years later when news of her son’s resurrection reached the king of Israel, whose excitement at the story led to more blessing for her and her family than she ever expected (II Kgs. 8:1-6).

When I look back at my own life, I realize that even those gifts that turned out to be bombs turned out to be gifts again in the end. Yes, they exploded, and explosions hurt...but they taught me how to trust God and gave me tools to help others caught in similar situations. They helped form who I am. They humbled me. They gave me opportunities to give a sacrifice of praise in the midst of the pain. And some of them became the beginnings of a road to what I’d consider now to be some of the coolest blessings in my life.

Psalm 23 gives an image of the Lord providing a “table” right smack in the middle of enemy territory. For some reason, every time I’ve pictured this verse, I see myself seated in a dark, cave-like space with enemies all around. But then the Lord would bring in a nice wooden table and put it right in front of me. I’ve had this image in my head for years, but I didn’t realize until quite recently that every time I pictured it, the table was empty.

What was I missing? That’s not the end of the story. That table’s not empty. The psalm isn’t talking about God following some IKEA instructions and managing to set a four-legged, wooden piece of furniture between us and our enemies. That’s ridiculous.

The expression in the psalm means a feast. The table’s already there. And the Lord is preparing on it a feast that fills it. He’s loading blessings into bowls and arranging them all over so that the table itself is barely part of the picture. When God says He’s preparing a table for us in the presence of our enemies, that means we get the chance to enjoy His rich goodness even as our enemies threaten us with their spears and arrows. And that goodness is full. It’s not a joke.

Pulling all of these strings together, I have a question for you: What do you think of when you think of God’s goodness? What do you think of when you hear that He has a gift in store for your life? Do you hear it as a joke? Are you about to say no because you’re afraid of disappointment?

I’m not very good at accepting gifts. I’m not one to easily think something good might come my way without a “catch” attached to it. 

But I see something in this story—and in all of Scripture, for that matter—that makes me think my suspicions are off-base. Maybe it’s time I doubt my doubts. How would life change if I decided to open my hands to God’s gifts without wondering if He was teasing me? How would life change if I decided to open my heart to God’s goodness without doubting its reality? What if I stopped imagining His table as empty?

Maybe this story—and my own story, when I let it play out—can remind my heart to sing that Danny Gokey song that describes it so well: 

Have you been praying and you still have no answers? 
Have you been pouring out your heart for so many years?
Have you been hoping that things would have changed by now?
Have you cried all the faith you have through so many tears? 
Don’t forget the things that He has done before
And remember He can do it all once more 
It’s like the brightest sunrise
Waiting on the other side of the darkest night
Don’t ever lose hope, hold on and believe
Maybe you just haven’t seen it, just haven’t seen it yet
You’re closer than you think you are
Only moments from the break of dawn
All His promises are just up ahead
Maybe you just haven’t seen it, just haven’t seen it yet⁴

God really is good. Will we give Him a chance to show us that? 

———————————————

¹ II Kings 4:16a, NIV (1984).

² II Kings 4:16b, ibid.

³ II Kings 4:28, ibid.

⁴ Danny Gokey, “Haven’t Seen It Yet” (2019).

Sunday, March 28, 2021

The Circus King


There was a hush after he said it. Shouts and whispers stilled. The jaws of some clenched tightly with anger; others were silenced in awe. An explosion had become safe and sacred, and the meaning of it all was still falling into place. Every ear still echoed with his words, resounding so loudly that only a few noticed the lonely clink of one last coin, whose wobbly rolling came to a decided end in the corner of the room.

We felt as though we could hear him breathe. In, then out. The angry ones squinted fiercely, daggers in their eyes. In again, and then they fled. Swishing fabric, the muffled slap of sandals on bare floor, and a single thump as one of them dropped a bag of silver: they were gone.

He breathed in again, and then the silence began to bubble—not yet with words but with the quiet giggles of children, the exhale of the freed, and more swishing cloaks as the rest of those there gathered in.

The place still lay in shambles. Tables and benches were overturned. Coins had been spilled everywhere. Bits of parchment and broken wood were scattered clumsily over the floor, interrupted here and there by pieces of frayed rope, tufts of wool, soft feathers, and empty money bags.

But the crowd didn’t seem to care. For once in their lives, they weren’t here to observe the room’s starchy beauty or to ponder what it’d be like to be on the other side of those tables, wearing linen robes and making the rules since you, after all, were the only ones who could see God. They weren’t here to fear whether their measly sums would be enough to buy their own pardon, nor were they here to be told what other long list of infirmities kept them this time from being really clean.

No, they were here because the prophet from Nazareth let them in. 

“It is written,” he had said, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it a ‘den of robbers.’”¹ The surly, teeth-clenched moneychangers had to leave; and the blind, the lame, and the outcasts were welcomed in.

Pretty soon the children were singing. A once-lame beggar was running in circles with his hands in the air. A once-blind man was running his fingers over the holy curtains, wondering at the colors and textures that illuminated his eyes. It seemed like the sound of laughter changed the heavy smell of incense into a reminder not of boundaries but of praise.

They had the place as theirs for awhile, until the noses of the priests came poking their way in. Shuffling around the edges of the rabble, they inserted their questions with disdain. “Do you hear what these children are saying?² ‘Hosanna to the Son of David’? What is this?”

“Yes, I hear them,” he replied. He picked up one of the children at his feet and set him proudly on his lap, brushing back the thick mop of hair so he could peer into the little one’s eyes. “Have you never read, ‘From the lips of children and infants you have ordained praise’?”³

Some more shuffling was paired with discontented grunts. They huddled together away from the troubling Rabbi, and the crowd filled in the place they left.

Pretty soon the work was done, and the Rabbi made his way out. The rabble followed. Silence filled the room again as the muttering priests and teachers realized their “problem” had walked out the door. Alone with the tables and piles of coins, they glared into the darkening night, watching him go. Beneath their furrowed brows, they wondered how much longer this insult would insist on overturning their world.

But the crowd that left with the Rabbi had the feeling that the world was meant to be that way. Their Teacher had said it himself: “‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’ For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”⁴

———————————

¹ Matthew 21:13 (NIV, 1984)

² Matthew 21:16a (ibid.)

³ Matthew 21:16b (ibid.)

⁴ Matthew 9:13 (ibid.)

Original Artwork by Miranda Dupree (2021). Artwork Quotations: Song lyrics from “The Greatest Show” (written by Ryan Lewis, Justin Paul, and Benj Pasek, 2017). Lyrics source: LyricFind.